*Rye, J., & Sintov, N.D. (2024) Predictors of electric vehicle adoption intent among rideshare drivers relative to commuters. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 179: 103943.

**Hurst, K., Sintov, N.D., & Donnelly, G. (2023). Increasing sustainable behavior through structured conversation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 86: 101948. doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101948

**Herziger, A., & Sintov, N.D. (2023). Give it a try! Electric vehicle test drives influence symbolism perceptions and adoption intent. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 85: 101907. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101907

**Hurst, K., & Sintov, N.D. (2022). Trusting autonomous vehicles as moral agents improves related policy support. Frontiers in Psychology, 13: 976023. DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2022.2091002

Sintov, N.D., & **Hurst, K. (2022). Experimental support for a trust heuristic. Journal of Risk Research. DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2022.2091002

**White, L.V., Carrel, A., Shi, W., & Sintov, N.D. (2022). Why are charging stations associated with electric vehicle adoption? Untangling effects in three United States metropolitan areas. Energy Research and Social Science, 89: 102663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102663

**Hurst, K., & Sintov, N.D. (2022). Guilt consistently motivates pro-environmental outcomes while pride depends on context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 80: 101776. /doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101776

*Adams, I., **Hurst, K.F., & Sintov, N.D. (2020). Experienced guilt, but not pride, mediates the effect of feedback on pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71: 101476. doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101476 

Sintov, N.D., *Abou-Ghalioum, V.K., & **White, L.V. (2020). The partisan politics of low-carbon transport: Why Democrats are more likely to adopt electric vehicles than Republicans in the United States. Energy Research and Social Science, 68: 101576.  DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101576

**White, L.V., & Sintov, N.D. (2020). Health and financial impacts of demand-side response measures differ across sociodemographic groups. Nature Energy, 5: 50-60. doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0507-y 

Sintov, N. D., **White, L.V., & *Walpole, H. (2019). Thermostat Wars? The roles of gender and thermal comfort negotiations in household energy use behavior. PLOS ONE, 4(11): e0224198. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0224198

Sintov, N.D., *Geislar, S., & *White, L.V. (2019). The role of cognitive accessibility in pro-environmental behavioral spillover: Results from a community field experiment of household food waste management. Environment and Behavior, 51, 50-80. doi:10.1177/0013916517735638

*White, L.V., & Sintov, N. D. (2018). Inaccurate consumer perceptions of monetary savings in a demand-side response programme predict programme acceptance. Nature Energy, 3: 1101–1108. doi: 10.1038/s41560-018-0285-y

Sintov, N.D., & Schuitema, G. (2018). Odd couple or perfect pair? Tensions and recommendations for social scientist-industry partnerships in energy research. Energy Policy, 117, 247-251. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.021

*White, L.,V.& Sintov, N. (2017). You are what you drive: Environmentalist and social innovator symbolism drive electric vehicle adoption intentions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 99, 94-113. doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.03.008

 Sintov, N.D., & Schultz, P.W. (2017). Adjustable Green Defaults Can Help Make Smart Homes More Sustainable. Sustainability (special issue on Smart Homes), 9, doi:10.3390/su9040622

Schuitema, G., & Sintov, N. (2017). Should we quit our jobs? Challenges, barriers, and recommendations for interdisciplinary energy research. Energy Policy, 101, 246-250. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.043

*Chen, B., & Sintov, N.D. (2016). Bridging the gap between technology adoption and protecting natural resources: Predicting intentions to adopt energy management technologies in California. Energy Research and Social Science, 22, 210-223. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.10.003

*Merrill, R. & Sintov, N.D. (2016). An affinity to commons model of public support for environmental energy policy. Energy Policy, 99, 88-99. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.048

Sintov, N.D., Dux, E., +Tran, A., & Orosz, M. (2016). What goes on behind closed doors? How college dormitory residents change to save energy during a competition-based energy reduction intervention. International Journal for Sustainability in Higher Education, 17, 451-470. doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-02-2015-0027

Konis, K., Orosz, M., & Sintov, N. (2016). A window into occupant-driven energy outcomes: leveraging sub-metering infrastructure to examine psychosocial factors driving long-term outcomes of short-term competition-based energy interventions. Energy & Buildings, 116, 206-217. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.01.005 

Sintov, N.D. & Schultz, P.W. (2015). Unlocking the potential of smart grid technologies with behavioral science. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00410